« Less Dead Than the Others, 1992 | Main | The Little White Girl Had to Bow Her Head for Emperor Hirohito, 2003 »


July 10, 2008

Tren de sombras, 1997

tren_sombras.gifOstensibly framed as a restoration of a degraded found film recovered some 70 years after the sudden and unexplained death of its creator, a Parisian attorney and amateur filmmaker named Gérard Fleury at a lake in the village of Le Thuit in Normandy, Tren de sombras (Train of Shadows) is a dense, sensual, and richly textured exposition of José Luis Guerín's recurring preoccupations: the nature and subjectivity of the image-gaze, the permeable borders between truth and fiction, the role of architecture (and landscape) as palimpsest of hidden histories. By placing the discovery of Fleury's last shot footage of his home and family within the context of the ambiguity surrounding the circumstances of his death after a seemingly innocuous scouting trip early one morning to find suitable lighting conditions to incorporate into his home movie, the found film becomes both a curious artifact of the early days of cinema in its informally staged performances that suggest the whimsical, created illusions of Georges Méliès (in a performance of dancing ties and magic tricks), and also a non-fiction, historical record that can be deconstructed, reconstituted, and re-analyzed to glean further information into the real-life mystery.

The dual nature of film is similarly suggested in the multilayered transitional shot between Fleury's footage from 1930 and modern day Le Thuit - the image of a caretaker sweeping leaves at a sidewalk corner overlooking a cemetery as schoolchildren cross at the intersection, a folding billboard advertising a cinémathèque program featuring pioneering filmmakers propped against a lamppost on the edge of the frame - visually repeating interchangeable themes of decay (fallen leaves, graveyard, film nitrate) and renewal (children, film revival, the act of sweeping). Interweaving depopulated, still-life compositions that alternately show ethereal images (casted shadows, lake mist, clouds, rays of light poking through occlusions, reflections on mirrors and windows) and physical objects (landscape, architecture, framed photographs, clocks, period furniture, camera equipment), Guerín further expounds on the idea of film as a medium of materiality and immateriality, where filmmaking itself becomes an act of creation (in capturing images that do not physically exist), destruction (in the chemical degradation of the medium), and transformation (in the projection of material into light). Moreover, by introducing sequences that overtly demonstrate the image manipulation of Fleury's unfinished film (with the apparent motive of finding hidden clues to the mysterious death) - splicing damaged footage, matching cuts that illustrate parallel gestures and expressions, freeze frames and zooms that provide detailed observation - Guerín not only reflects on filmmaking as a godlike process of suspension and reanimation, but also on the inherent responsibilities (and limitations) that it enables in creating permutations of the story, where truth is arbitrarily defined by editing, and the idea of closure to a story is negated by the competing idea that the same film can be rewound, reconfigured, and re-edited into a plurality of equally valid, alternate endings. It is this open-endedness that is reflected in the film's long take, closing shot of a dead-end street intersection in Fleury (a recurring aesthetic that also surfaces in Guerín's En Construcción and In the City of Sylvia), where people momentarily pass into and out of frame - each passerby representing another open story, each passage, a corridor leading to new, alternate angles of perspective and (re)discovery.

Posted by acquarello on Jul 10, 2008 | | Filed under 2008, José Luis Guerín

Comments

Guerín's use of color in this film is nothing short of fantastic. Big fan of your essays, swing by my (newly) revived portal sometime.

Posted by: Eric on Jul 17, 2008 10:04 AM | Permalink

Indeed! The colors also seemed more saturated on this one than in Guerín's other films. And the manipulation of the found footage was quite good too, very much like an avant-garde film where the properties of the medium are part of the image-making process itself.

Posted by: acquarello [TypeKey Profile Page] on Jul 17, 2008 6:57 PM | Permalink

kinda reminded me of "man with a movie camera." what do you think was the significance of the "characters" in the found film standing still?

Posted by: joe sixxpack on Sep 26, 2009 7:20 PM | Permalink

I thought it was maybe a bit like revealing the "visual trickery" of film, like you would with magic, where he shows that what you thought was real was also a staging (and even a "documentary" is a construction and cannot truly represent the real).

Posted by: acquarello [TypeKey Profile Page] on Sep 27, 2009 8:01 AM | Permalink

Interesting. I thought it was him showing that these people are "living" inside this old film and thus exist and function under certain conditions.

Posted by: Joe sixxxpack on Oct 11, 2009 12:19 AM | Permalink


Post a comment:

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)